It amazed me how much flak they both got. I mean, it’s only for a year. It’s only to understand what you might be missing, to find titles and authors you’re not going to come across in the normal course of events.
I don’t think it will be easy; it might be impossible to make it through an entire year without reading authors like that. I know I follow a few series that are written by authors like those, and, no, I am not willing to give them up for a year. It would only be a few books. Yes, I can read them next year. BUT they are series I love and I don’t know if I can to wait months more to find out what happens next for the sake of an ideal. I am just that attached to the characters.
But that doesn’t mean I can’t focus on other writers. I can. When I look for a new book, I can look for books that fit this challenge.
And that brings up one of the more often things I’ve seen say in response to this challenge.
- The books they read are good and they see no need to stop reading them for the sake of an ideal, not even for a limited period of time.
- They don’t care what gender, sexuality and race of the writer is, and it doesn’t factor into their book choice.
I understand that. I do. Probably I would have said the same thing once. (I did say the same thing once. LOL)
As a teenager, I, an avid science fiction and fantasy reader, never ventured over to the romance shelves and couldn’t understand why anyone would read romance. I decided to dedicate one summer vacation to reading only romance to find out. I figured I could do without aliens and magic and spaceships for two months. 😉
Most of it was okay, some sucked and some it was really good. There are a few writers I still read, and I am open to finding more. I think that experiment added a lot to my reading choices, a lot more joy and depth than I would have had otherwise.
I don’t think the end result of K. T. Bradford’s reading challenge would be that different. I really don’t.
As for the thing where people don’t know or care about the gender/race/sexuality of the writer? Most people don’t care. I don’t, either. And they aren’t always easy to find out, either.
Those things aren’t always obvious in the author’s name. Sometimes authors choose pen name so that gender is hidden or not obvious on purpose.
The author picture in the back can make race obvious, but I never look there unless I’ve already decided to read the book, and afterward, I am not going to change my mind based on a picture.
As for sexuality? It’s impossible to know unless the author makes that information available, in the author introduction below the author picture, on twitter, on a blog, in an interview.
So even if I wanted to, I don’t think it would be all that easy to select for all of those things on purpose.
But if those are the vast majority of authors to come your way, the ones you hear of, the ones that fall into your lap, well, those are what you will read.
I think people need to take another look at the writers they have read for the past year and see. It’s not as if there is a shortage of writers that are not white, straight, cis or male. Not in science fiction and fantasy, which are the genres I am most familiar, and people have made lists of such writers. (Straight romance might well lack male writers. I’ve heard male romance writers need to write with a female pen name. Really makes me wonder which of the romance writers I read are male.)
Anyway, even if people aren’t selecting writers for anything in particular, such selection can still happen. If it does, looking for a few other types of writers can add an extra something to your reading life. A little extra joy, a little extra zip.
I, by the way, will soon be engaging in just such an examination of last year’s reading list. I want to see what kind of diversity my reading life has, especially when I choose books that just sort of come my way.